|
‘Full airing’ needed in Reid case
Minister responds to report on
school board member
By RICK CONRAD and DAVID JACKSON
Staff Reporters
Bernadette Reid could be
kicked off the Halifax regional school board and may even face
criminal charges after the province referred a damning report
from a conflict-of-interest inquiry to the police and courts on
Wednesday.
"These are serious allegations that are made, and I think that
there needs (to be) a full airing," Justice Minister Murray
Scott said of sending inquiry commissioner LeRoy Lenethen’s
report to Halifax Regional Police and Nova Scotia Supreme Court.
The minister said he didn’t want to comment on the specifics of
the case.
"I think the public demand that all of us hold the public trust
in high regard, so I think it’s important that we do everything
we can to ensure that trust is well-founded," he said.
In his strongly worded 72-page report, Mr. Lenethen found that
Ms. Reid "deliberately and knowingly" misled the public and the
rest of the board when she sold products to her husband’s former
school and another board school.
Carl Reid resigned as principal of Gaetz Brook Junior High in
June 2005 after a board investigation found that $11,333 of
school funds was used for non-school purposes. He pleaded not
guilty to charges of theft and fraud this week. A trial date
will be set Oct. 27.
Mr. Lenethen found that Ms. Reid was in a conflict of interest,
breached the public’s trust and committed malfeasance and
misconduct. But he also said he believed she did not know "of
any breach of board policy by her husband."
Still, Ms. Reid skirted the board’s purchasing policy by giving
an "unusual" 19.76 per cent discount on products she sold to
Gaetz Brook to stay "under the radar of the board’s purchasing
policy," Mr. Lenethen wrote. "I am satisfied that had she not
been confronted with each of these transactions, she would not
have disclosed any of them.
"Her various responses were deliberate attempts to conceal or
obscure the true facts of the transactions."
Under the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act, the justice
minister can ask the court to rule whether a board member has
violated the act.
If a judge finds that the member did contravene the act, the
seat is declared vacant. The member could also be barred from
sitting on any board or council for up to 10 years or be subject
to a fine.
Board members were scheduled to discuss the report at a special
meeting Wednesday evening but decided instead to wrap it up
early.
After board lawyer Ian Pickard presented the report, member Gin
Yee immediately made a motion to adjourn and a majority of
members agreed.
"The report spoke for itself, it went to the attorney general,
it’s going to the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia," Mr. Yee told
reporters after the meeting.
"What else can we discuss? We didn’t really need to debate it. I
was concerned that debate would have been volatile."
Ms. Reid was at the meeting Wednesday night but would not talk
to reporters.
"I’m not giving any comment because I have decided not to give
any comments," she said as she left the building with family and
friends, pursued by reporters and camera operators.
Doug Sparks, the board’s African-Nova Scotian representative,
said he wasn’t defending Ms. Reid but wondered why other board
members don’t take an equally hard look at their own actions and
potential conflicts of interest.
"When we talk about conflict of interest, what we apply to one
individual we need to apply to all of us," he said. "You guys
are aware of a couple of incidents where clearly there could
have been and certainly are conflicts of interest."
Mr. Sparks wouldn’t elaborate. But board chairman Gary O’Hara
said that Mr. Sparks complained to him that a sitting board
member may not have paid for campaign literature she had printed
for the 2004 board elections. Mr. O’Hara refused to identify the
member.
"There’s no foundation to it," he said. "I looked at that and I
found there was no foundation to it. If there was foundation to
it, I’d bring it forth."
Debra Barlow, the board’s vice-chairwoman, said Mr. Sparks’s
allegations are groundless.
"I happen to know the member that he is speaking about and that
member has two legal opinions that she is not in conflict. So
let Mr. Sparks bring that forward and he can dance all he
wants."
Mr. Sparks said he may do just that.
"I have some pointed
questions that I need some answers to. If I’m satisfied with the
responses I get, that’s fine. If . . . there needs to be further
investigation, I will be bringing forth a motion to request that
to happen and we’ll see what happens."
(rconrad@herald.ca)
Source: The Herald, Thursday,
October 5, 2006
http://www.herald.ca
|